MarketCap
Facebook
X
Telegram
Montauk Renewables Financial Ratios 2025-2011 | MNTK
Brief overview of Montauk Renewables's valuation multiples
This overview follows the five latest available observations from 2020 through 2025.
The valuation comparison uses P/E 112.09x (median 48.26x), EV/EBITDA 11.18x (median 16.69x), P/S 1.11x (median 4.12x). Multiples are on average 61.6% below their own medians. Shares look cheaper than their recent historical valuation.
At the current P/E, inverse earnings yield is 0.9%, a useful bridge between price and business earnings.
Capital efficiency is characterized by ROE 0.7%, ROA 0.4%, ROCE 0.3%. Profitability sends a weak positive signal and leaves the business sensitive to cost or demand pressure.
PEG is 6.73x. Price is well ahead of embedded growth, making market expectations demanding.
The cash conversion cycle is 14.9 days versus 11.4 days initially. Turnover changed little.
Conclusion
Montauk Renewables trades below its own history, but weak profitability may explain the discount. Low multiples alone do not prove undervaluation.
Annual Financial Ratios Montauk Renewables
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P/E |
112.1 | 20.0 | 48.3 | 38.8 | -319.2 | 295.2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
P/S |
1.1 | 1.1 | 4.1 | 6.6 | 9.8 | 13.5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
EPS |
0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | -0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
EV (Enterprise Value) |
344 M | 241 M | 748 M | 1.36 B | 1.5 B | 1.43 B | 89.4 M | 114 M | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
EBITDA per Share |
0.22 | 0.28 | 0.32 | 0.46 | 0.19 | 0.18 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
EV/EBITDA |
11.2 | 6.1 | 16.7 | 20.9 | 55.8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
PEG |
6.73 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
P/B |
0.7 | 0.8 | 2.9 | 6.0 | 7.9 | 8.5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
P/CF |
6.5 | 4.5 | 17.6 | 16.8 | 33.7 | 47.4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
ROE % |
0.66 | 3.78 | 5.97 | 15.50 | -2.48 | 2.88 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
ROA % |
0.40 | 2.79 | 4.27 | 10.59 | -1.58 | 1.82 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
ROCE % |
0.32 | 6.26 | 9.45 | 19.62 | 1.83 | 2.24 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Current Ratio |
2.5 | 3.8 | 3.5 | 3.2 | 2.7 | 2.7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
DSO |
14.9 | 21.2 | 20.6 | 14.6 | 11.4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
DPO |
- | 88.5 | 76.2 | 61.9 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Operating Cycle |
14.9 | 21.2 | 20.6 | 14.6 | 11.4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Cash Conversion Cycle |
14.9 | -67.3 | -55.7 | -47.4 | 11.4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
All numbers in USD currency
Quarterly Financial Ratios Montauk Renewables
| 2026-Q1 | 2025-Q3 | 2025-Q2 | 2025-Q1 | 2024-Q4 | 2024-Q3 | 2024-Q2 | 2024-Q1 | 2023-Q4 | 2023-Q3 | 2023-Q2 | 2023-Q1 | 2022-Q4 | 2022-Q3 | 2022-Q2 | 2022-Q1 | 2021-Q4 | 2021-Q3 | 2021-Q2 | 2021-Q1 | 2020-Q4 | 2020-Q3 | 2020-Q2 | 2020-Q1 | 2019-Q4 | 2019-Q3 | 2019-Q2 | 2019-Q1 | 2018-Q4 | 2018-Q3 | 2018-Q2 | 2018-Q1 | 2017-Q4 | 2017-Q3 | 2017-Q2 | 2017-Q1 | 2016-Q4 | 2016-Q3 | 2016-Q2 | 2016-Q1 | 2015-Q4 | 2015-Q3 | 2015-Q2 | 2015-Q1 | 2014-Q4 | 2014-Q3 | 2014-Q2 | 2014-Q1 | 2013-Q4 | 2013-Q3 | 2013-Q2 | 2013-Q1 | 2012-Q4 | 2012-Q3 | 2012-Q2 | 2012-Q1 | 2011-Q4 | 2011-Q3 | 2011-Q2 | 2011-Q1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPS |
- | 0.04 | -0.04 | - | - | 0.12 | -0.01 | 0.01 | - | 0.09 | 0.01 | -0.03 | - | 0.08 | 0.14 | -0.01 | - | 0.06 | -0.03 | -0.1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
EBITDA per Share |
0.05 | 0.09 | 0.03 | 0.05 | - | 0.2 | 0.05 | 0.05 | - | 0.16 | 0.13 | -0.06 | - | 0.13 | 0.21 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.17 | 0.08 | -0.05 | -0.01 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
ROE % |
-0.34 | 5.85 | 3.58 | 6.46 | 6.64 | 11.96 | 6.21 | 4.80 | 4.07 | 9.19 | 13.22 | 12.17 | 13.85 | 16.87 | 16.86 | 4.65 | -3.40 | -4.87 | -11.29 | -9.42 | 2.88 | -1.31 | -0.99 | 3.64 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
ROA % |
-0.21 | 4.35 | 2.79 | 4.75 | 4.88 | 8.62 | 4.37 | 3.39 | 2.87 | 6.33 | 8.68 | 7.99 | 9.16 | 11.08 | 11.05 | 3.11 | -2.14 | -3.09 | -7.33 | -6.11 | 1.82 | -0.82 | -0.62 | 2.30 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
ROCE % |
0.33 | 9.19 | 7.82 | 9.68 | 9.52 | 16.42 | 14.12 | 7.49 | 6.56 | 12.79 | 17.58 | 10.73 | 17.03 | 22.15 | 19.79 | 7.76 | 1.25 | -5.15 | -5.98 | -3.42 | 2.24 | 3.03 | 2.23 | -1.74 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Current Ratio |
2.3 | 3.1 | 3.0 | 3.7 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 3.4 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.4 | 3.1 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 3.1 | 2.9 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 2.8 | 2.9 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 2.7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
DSO |
10.1 | 12.9 | 15.3 | 17.1 | - | 28.2 | 32.8 | 25.9 | - | 25.1 | 16.2 | 31.8 | - | 29.5 | 19.8 | 21.0 | - | 28.3 | 23.3 | 17.3 | - | 17.0 | 17.2 | 13.1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
DPO |
- | 354.2 | 211.2 | 139.7 | - | 100.7 | 135.1 | 106.8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Operating Cycle |
- | 12.9 | 15.3 | 17.1 | - | 28.2 | 32.8 | 25.9 | - | 25.1 | 16.2 | 31.8 | - | 29.5 | 19.8 | 21.0 | - | 28.3 | 23.3 | 17.3 | - | 17.0 | 17.2 | 13.1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Cash Conversion Cycle |
- | -341.2 | -195.9 | -122.7 | - | -72.4 | -102.3 | -81.0 | - | 25.1 | 16.2 | 31.8 | - | 29.5 | 19.8 | 21.0 | - | 28.3 | 23.3 | 17.3 | - | 17.0 | 17.2 | 13.1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
All numbers in USD currency
Multiples are an important financial analysis tool for the company Montauk Renewables, allowing investors and analysts to quickly assess the company’s value and investment attractiveness based on the ratio of market indicators to the company’s financial performance. Essentially, multiples express how the market values the company relative to its earnings, revenue, equity, or other key metrics.
Advantages of Using Financial Ratios- Simplified Data Analysis
Financial ratios transform large volumes of accounting data into compact and easily interpretable indicators, significantly simplifying the assessment of the company’s condition. - Comparability Between Companies
Multiples standardize financial metrics, enabling objective comparison of companies of different sizes, industries, and market capitalizations. - Identification of Trends and Issues
Regular analysis of ratios helps track the dynamics of financial health, identify strengths and weaknesses of the business, as well as potential risks. - Decision Support
Financial multiples serve as an important tool for investors, creditors, and company management in making investment, credit, and managerial decisions. - Accelerated Assessment of Investment Attractiveness
Ratios allow quick determination of key performance, liquidity, and financial stability indicators, facilitating prompt evaluation of companies’ attractiveness for investments.
Using multiples enables comparison between companies, even if they differ in size or industry, as they standardize financial data into ratios convenient for analysis. This is especially useful for evaluating companies where direct analysis of financial statements may be complex or require in-depth knowledge.