MarketCapExport financials
Image Sensing Systems, Inc. (ISNS)
The export includes the complete available history of financial statements and ratios. Numbers are provided in full, without million or billion abbreviations, in their original reporting units.
CSV downloads as a ZIP archive with one file for each report and frequency.
Facebook
X
TelegramImage Sensing Systems, Inc. Financial Ratios 2020-2011 | ISNS
Brief overview of Image Sensing Systems, Inc.'s multiples and efficiency
This overview follows the five latest available observations from 2016 through 2020.
Market valuation is represented by P/E 21.85x (median 14.45x), EV/EBITDA 9.92x (median 9.31x), P/S 1.76x (median 1.76x). The multiple basket looks neutral against its history, differing from median levels by roughly 0%.
The inverse P/E implies an earnings yield of 4.6%. This is not a dividend yield, but current earnings relative to market price.
Current measures of operating quality are ROE 5.5%, ROA 5%, ROCE 3%. Profitability remains low. Market valuation has limited fundamental support until resource returns improve.
Cash turnover speed was broadly preserved, with the cycle moving from 109.5 days to 103.9 days.
Overall assessment
Image Sensing Systems, Inc.'s profile looks neutral, with price and fundamental efficiency broadly aligned.
Annual Financial Ratios Image Sensing Systems, Inc.
| 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21.9 | 4.2 | 14.4 | 7.8 | 27.9 | -5.1 | -1.2 | -1.7 | -7.5 | -3.1 | |
P/S |
1.8 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
EV/EBITDA |
9.9 | 9.3 | 8.2 | 4.8 | 14.7 | 13.9 | -1.3 | -2.2 | 10.1 | 44.9 |
PEG |
-0.26 | 0.02 | -1.13 | 0.04 | -0.23 | 0.08 | 0.03 | -0.0 | 0.11 | 0.01 |
P/B |
1.2 | 1.6 | 2.5 | 1.9 | 3.1 | 3.0 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 0.9 |
P/CF |
9.6 | 35.2 | 24.3 | 10.1 | -13.8 | -5.1 | -3.6 | -4.0 | 4.6 | -14.3 |
ROE % |
5.49 | 39.01 | 17.50 | 24.05 | 11.06 | -57.48 | -116.62 | -85.89 | -9.86 | -27.58 |
ROA % |
4.96 | 36.46 | 13.81 | 18.67 | 8.37 | -34.58 | -65.16 | -65.21 | -8.70 | -24.28 |
ROCE % |
3.05 | 10.20 | 18.76 | 24.56 | 13.09 | 9.25 | -95.15 | -63.62 | 0.13 | -2.94 |
DSO |
62.6 | 77.4 | 96.0 | 83.9 | 77.7 | 73.5 | 66.8 | 72.9 | 98.3 | 121.4 |
DIO |
100.9 | 91.1 | 168.9 | 41.8 | 12.6 | 68.0 | 101.4 | 132.5 | 244.1 | 243.2 |
DPO |
71.7 | 43.5 | 115.0 | 70.3 | 22.8 | 159.5 | 150.5 | 88.9 | 115.0 | 79.1 |
Annual performance
Select metrics to display
All numbers in USD currency
Multiples are an important financial analysis tool for the company Image Sensing Systems, Inc., allowing investors and analysts to quickly assess the company’s value and investment attractiveness based on the ratio of market indicators to the company’s financial performance. Essentially, multiples express how the market values the company relative to its earnings, revenue, equity, or other key metrics.
Advantages of Using Financial Ratios- Simplified Data Analysis
Financial ratios transform large volumes of accounting data into compact and easily interpretable indicators, significantly simplifying the assessment of the company’s condition. - Comparability Between Companies
Multiples standardize financial metrics, enabling objective comparison of companies of different sizes, industries, and market capitalizations. - Identification of Trends and Issues
Regular analysis of ratios helps track the dynamics of financial health, identify strengths and weaknesses of the business, as well as potential risks. - Decision Support
Financial multiples serve as an important tool for investors, creditors, and company management in making investment, credit, and managerial decisions. - Accelerated Assessment of Investment Attractiveness
Ratios allow quick determination of key performance, liquidity, and financial stability indicators, facilitating prompt evaluation of companies’ attractiveness for investments.
Using multiples enables comparison between companies, even if they differ in size or industry, as they standardize financial data into ratios convenient for analysis. This is especially useful for evaluating companies where direct analysis of financial statements may be complex or require in-depth knowledge.
Financial Ratios of other stocks in the Scientific technical instruments industry
| Issuer | Price | % 24h | Market Cap | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
Fortive Corporation
FTV
|
$ 67.78 | 1.01 % | $ 22.5 B |  USA |
 |
Keysight Technologies
KEYS
|
$ 291.24 | 0.79 % | $ 50.1 B | USA |
 |
MIND Technology
MIND
|
$ 3.05 | -6.15 % | $ 25.2 M | USA |
 |
MicroVision
MVIS
|
$ 1.16 | -6.45 % | $ 317 M | USA |
 |
Sensata Technologies Holding plc
ST
|
$ 40.34 | -0.42 % | $ 5.91 B |  Niderland |
 |
Teledyne Technologies Incorporated
TDY
|
$ 646.64 | 0.51 % | $ 30.3 B | USA |
 |
Trimble
TRMB
|
$ 54.75 | 0.12 % | $ 13.1 B | USA |
 |
CyberOptics Corporation
CYBE
|
- | - | $ 401 M | USA |
 |
Vontier Corporation
VNT
|
$ 43.11 | -1.75 % | $ 6.32 B | USA |
 |
Vishay Precision Group
VPG
|
$ 49.35 | 1.42 % | $ 654 M | USA |
 |
Cognex Corporation
CGNX
|
$ 50.56 | 0.44 % | $ 8.5 B | USA |
 |
Schmitt Industries
SMIT
|
- | 10.39 % | $ 1.62 M | USA |
 |
Velodyne Lidar
VLDR
|
- | - | $ 300 M | USA |
 |
Luna Innovations Incorporated
LUNA
|
- | -58.85 % | $ 27.4 M | USA |
 |
FARO Technologies
FARO
|
- | - | $ 842 M | USA |
 |
Bonso Electronics International
BNSO
|
- | -5.08 % | $ 5.44 M |  China |
 |
FLIR Systems, Inc.
FLIR
|
- | - | $ 7.56 B | USA |
 |
Garmin Ltd.
GRMN
|
$ 288.66 | -1.08 % | $ 55.6 B |  Schweiz |
 |
ESCO Technologies
ESE
|
$ 238.37 | -0.93 % | $ 6.15 B | USA |
 |
Genasys
GNSS
|
$ 1.42 | 1.07 % | $ 64 M | USA |
 |
Itron
ITRI
|
$ 99.49 | -0.48 % | $ 4.53 B | USA |
 |
Mesa Laboratories
MLAB
|
$ 137.4 | 7.49 % | $ 758 M | USA |
 |
MKS Instruments
MKSI
|
$ 213.24 | 0.78 % | $ 14.4 B | USA |
 |
MTS Systems Corporation
MTSC
|
- | - | $ 1.14 B | USA |
 |
Energous Corporation
WATT
|
$ 8.89 | 2.3 % | $ 13.2 M | USA |
 |
Electro-Sensors
ELSE
|
$ 7.74 | - | $ 26.8 M | USA |
 |
Novanta
NOVT
|
$ 123.95 | -15.09 % | $ 4.54 B | USA |