MarketCap
Facebook
X
Telegram
Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. Financial Ratios 2025-2011 | MSGE
Brief overview of Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.'s multiples and efficiency
The comparison uses the five latest available annual observations between 2021 and 2025.
Key multiples at the end of the period are P/E 64.55x (median 46.85x), P/S 1.77x (median 2.48x), P/B 0.97x (median 0.91x). Current valuation broadly matches recent historical reference points; the difference from five-year medians is -9.8%.
At the current P/E, inverse earnings yield is 1.5%, a useful bridge between price and business earnings.
Returns on assets and capital are represented by ROE 1.5%, ROA 0.8%, ROCE -10.3%. Negative returns point to losses or poor capital efficiency. Valuation multiples are less informative in this setting.
Current PEG is 0.56x; the market pays comparatively little per unit of expected growth.
The cash cycle changed only slightly and ended at 64.9 days.
Overall picture
Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.'s profile looks neutral, with price and fundamental efficiency broadly aligned.
Annual Financial Ratios Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P/E |
64.5 | -5.8 | 2.2 | 29.1 | 1055.9 | -65.6 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
P/S |
1.8 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 12.3 | 14.9 | 21.7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
EPS |
0.9 | -6.5 | 14.5 | -5.8 | -4.6 | -1.6 | -0.3 | 0.3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
EV (Enterprise Value) |
3.61 B | 3.13 B | 3.09 B | 4.49 B | 3.83 B | 3.4 B | -352 M | -427 M | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
EBITDA per Share |
2.96 | -2.7 | -4.9 | 2.19 | 2.72 | 1.87 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
EV/EBITDA |
-1.5 | -9.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||
PEG |
- | 0.56 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||
P/B |
1.0 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 1.3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
P/CF |
8.9 | 32.6 | 7.4 | 13.9 | -40.8 | 11.9 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
ROE % |
1.50 | -10.50 | 19.46 | 3.42 | 0.10 | -2.43 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
ROA % |
0.79 | -5.12 | 10.11 | 1.22 | 0.04 | -1.50 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
ROCE % |
-10.28 | -11.84 | -10.57 | -2.52 | -1.34 | -2.04 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Current Ratio |
2.1 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 4.3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
DSO |
- | - | - | - | 64.9 | 61.8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Operating Cycle |
- | - | - | - | 64.9 | 61.8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Cash Conversion Cycle |
- | - | - | - | 64.9 | 61.8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
All numbers in USD currency
Quarterly Financial Ratios Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.
| 2026-Q1 | 2025-Q3 | 2025-Q2 | 2025-Q1 | 2024-Q3 | 2024-Q2 | 2024-Q1 | 2023-Q4 | 2023-Q3 | 2023-Q1 | 2022-Q4 | 2022-Q3 | 2022-Q2 | 2022-Q1 | 2021-Q4 | 2021-Q3 | 2021-Q2 | 2021-Q1 | 2020-Q4 | 2020-Q3 | 2020-Q2 | 2020-Q1 | 2019-Q4 | 2019-Q3 | 2019-Q2 | 2019-Q1 | 2018-Q4 | 2018-Q3 | 2018-Q2 | 2018-Q1 | 2017-Q4 | 2017-Q3 | 2017-Q2 | 2017-Q1 | 2016-Q4 | 2016-Q3 | 2016-Q2 | 2016-Q1 | 2015-Q4 | 2015-Q3 | 2015-Q2 | 2015-Q1 | 2014-Q4 | 2014-Q3 | 2014-Q2 | 2014-Q1 | 2013-Q4 | 2013-Q3 | 2013-Q2 | 2013-Q1 | 2012-Q4 | 2012-Q3 | 2012-Q2 | 2012-Q1 | 2011-Q4 | 2011-Q3 | 2011-Q2 | 2011-Q1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPS |
-0.04 | -2.8 | 4.18 | -2.27 | -2.95 | -1.31 | -1.33 | -4.91 | 1.9 | -1.64 | 1.95 | -1.3 | 0.66 | -0.51 | 0.07 | -2.32 | -2.25 | -0.79 | -1.64 | -1.05 | 5.27 | -5.52 | 3.29 | -2.33 | -2.47 | -0.62 | 3.65 | -1.31 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
EBITDA per Share |
2.55 | -1.26 | 0.93 | 0.16 | -1 | 0.31 | 1.11 | - | -1.59 | - | 2.15 | -0.44 | 2.55 | 0.62 | 1.92 | -1.58 | 0.35 | -1.58 | -0.62 | -0.89 | -3.68 | -4.17 | 4.04 | -1.72 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
ROE % |
-1.76 | -6.51 | -3.74 | -12.24 | -15.44 | -8.37 | -9.25 | -3.97 | 0.72 | -0.64 | 1.35 | -1.89 | -3.34 | -8.03 | -11.47 | -13.66 | -11.17 | -12.01 | -10.91 | -5.73 | -6.62 | -4.55 | -1.95 | -1.66 | 0.52 | 2.82 | 3.39 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
ROA % |
-0.57 | -2.96 | -0.52 | -7.68 | -9.39 | -5.73 | -3.12 | -1.97 | 0.76 | -0.20 | 0.43 | -0.69 | -1.35 | -3.21 | -4.54 | -5.94 | -5.45 | -7.34 | -8.11 | -8.45 | -9.14 | -7.58 | -3.48 | -3.48 | -1.79 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
ROCE % |
-11.54 | -16.94 | -13.88 | -13.36 | -12.34 | -9.90 | -3.29 | 4.68 | 2.34 | 2.81 | 2.90 | 0.90 | -0.74 | -4.42 | -8.61 | -12.02 | -10.16 | -11.90 | -12.26 | -7.86 | -8.40 | -6.68 | -3.03 | -2.41 | 0.24 | 2.46 | 3.27 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Current Ratio |
2.1 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 1.9 | 2.0 | - | - | 2.0 | 2.2 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 2.9 | 4.6 | 4.4 | 4.4 | - | 5.0 | 5.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
DSO |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 53.1 | 117.5 | 144.6 | 19.2 | 57.1 | 32.6 | 56.2 | 20.4 | 39.1 | 37.1 | 32.3 | 225.5 | 181.5 | 9.4 | 41.6 | 17.2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Operating Cycle |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 53.1 | 117.5 | 144.6 | 19.2 | 57.1 | 32.6 | 56.2 | 20.4 | 39.1 | 37.1 | 32.3 | 225.5 | 181.5 | 9.4 | 41.6 | 17.2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Cash Conversion Cycle |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 53.1 | 117.5 | 144.6 | 19.2 | 57.1 | 32.6 | 56.2 | 20.4 | 39.1 | 37.1 | 32.3 | 225.5 | 181.5 | 9.4 | 41.6 | 17.2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
All numbers in USD currency
Multiples are an important financial analysis tool for the company Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp., allowing investors and analysts to quickly assess the company’s value and investment attractiveness based on the ratio of market indicators to the company’s financial performance. Essentially, multiples express how the market values the company relative to its earnings, revenue, equity, or other key metrics.
Advantages of Using Financial Ratios- Simplified Data Analysis
Financial ratios transform large volumes of accounting data into compact and easily interpretable indicators, significantly simplifying the assessment of the company’s condition. - Comparability Between Companies
Multiples standardize financial metrics, enabling objective comparison of companies of different sizes, industries, and market capitalizations. - Identification of Trends and Issues
Regular analysis of ratios helps track the dynamics of financial health, identify strengths and weaknesses of the business, as well as potential risks. - Decision Support
Financial multiples serve as an important tool for investors, creditors, and company management in making investment, credit, and managerial decisions. - Accelerated Assessment of Investment Attractiveness
Ratios allow quick determination of key performance, liquidity, and financial stability indicators, facilitating prompt evaluation of companies’ attractiveness for investments.
Using multiples enables comparison between companies, even if they differ in size or industry, as they standardize financial data into ratios convenient for analysis. This is especially useful for evaluating companies where direct analysis of financial statements may be complex or require in-depth knowledge.
Russia
USA
Canada
Britain
China
