MarketCap
Facebook
X
TelegramSprague Resources LP Financial Ratios 2021-2011 | SRLP
Brief overview of Sprague Resources LP's financial ratios
The review covers five available annual periods spanning 2016 to 2020.
The valuation comparison uses P/E 14.85x (median 14.85x), P/S 0.22x (median 0.21x), P/CF 3.53x (median 3.53x). Current valuation broadly matches recent historical reference points; the difference from five-year medians is 0%.
The 1/P/E calculation produces a 6.7% earnings yield. It does not capture future growth or capital structure.
Returns on assets and capital are represented by ROE 105.1%, ROA -4.9%, ROCE 49%. Negative returns point to losses or poor capital efficiency. Valuation multiples are less informative in this setting.
Price, earnings and growth produce a PEG of 1.82x. A high value reduces the cushion if growth slows.
The cash cycle accelerated by 11.9 days to 46.8 days. Less capital is tied up in operations.
Overall assessment
Sprague Resources LP trades near its familiar ratio range. A new earnings or profitability trend is needed to change the view.
Annual Financial Ratios Sprague Resources LP
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P/E |
- | 14.9 | 12.5 | 5.1 | 20.1 | 57.8 | 5.5 | 3.9 | -13.5 | - | - |
P/S |
- | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | - | - |
EPS |
-2.7 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 3.2 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 3.7 | 5.9 | -1.5 | - | - |
EV (Enterprise Value) |
1.48 B | 1.64 B | 1.57 B | 1.51 B | 1.82 B | 1.47 B | 1.24 B | 1.7 B | 1.19 B | 909 M | 792 M |
EBITDA per Share |
- | 5.18 | 4.9 | 6.88 | 4.16 | 2.86 | 6.04 | 8.68 | 1.02 | - | - |
EV/EBITDA |
1251.6 | 10.4 | 10.8 | 6.8 | 14.2 | 18.8 | 8.0 | 7.3 | 40.3 | - | - |
PEG |
- | 1.82 | -0.22 | 0.03 | 0.11 | -0.65 | -0.15 | 0.01 | 0.05 | - | - |
P/B |
- | 8.6 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
P/CF |
- | 3.5 | -4.9 | 2.9 | 58.8 | 5.1 | 1.6 | -157.7 | -3.6 | - | - |
ROE % |
105.08 | 57.60 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
ROA % |
-4.86 | 2.82 | 2.45 | 6.41 | 2.16 | 1.00 | 7.83 | 9.17 | -3.22 | - | - |
ROCE % |
49.02 | 15.17 | 13.97 | 17.02 | 9.75 | 7.04 | 22.43 | 27.45 | 1.34 | - | - |
Current Ratio |
1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.4 | - | - |
DSO |
24.7 | 30.2 | 29.3 | 26.1 | 40.5 | 34.0 | 17.0 | 20.9 | 19.1 | - | - |
DIO |
38.0 | 44.3 | 32.8 | 27.2 | 46.6 | 52.9 | 27.4 | 29.9 | 28.3 | - | - |
DPO |
15.9 | 16.9 | 16.5 | 20.8 | 28.5 | 23.0 | 10.4 | 15.2 | 14.2 | - | - |
Operating Cycle |
62.7 | 74.4 | 62.1 | 53.4 | 87.1 | 86.9 | 44.5 | 50.7 | 47.4 | - | - |
Cash Conversion Cycle |
46.8 | 57.6 | 45.6 | 32.6 | 58.6 | 63.9 | 34.1 | 35.5 | 33.2 | - | - |
All numbers in USD currency
Quarterly Financial Ratios Sprague Resources LP
| 2022-Q4 | 2022-Q3 | 2022-Q2 | 2022-Q1 | 2021-Q4 | 2021-Q3 | 2021-Q2 | 2021-Q1 | 2020-Q4 | 2020-Q3 | 2020-Q2 | 2020-Q1 | 2019-Q4 | 2019-Q3 | 2019-Q2 | 2019-Q1 | 2018-Q4 | 2018-Q3 | 2018-Q2 | 2018-Q1 | 2017-Q4 | 2017-Q3 | 2017-Q2 | 2017-Q1 | 2016-Q4 | 2016-Q3 | 2016-Q2 | 2016-Q1 | 2015-Q4 | 2015-Q3 | 2015-Q2 | 2015-Q1 | 2014-Q4 | 2014-Q3 | 2014-Q2 | 2014-Q1 | 2013-Q4 | 2013-Q3 | 2013-Q2 | 2013-Q1 | 2012-Q4 | 2012-Q3 | 2012-Q2 | 2012-Q1 | 2011-Q4 | 2011-Q3 | 2011-Q2 | 2011-Q1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPS |
- | - | - | 0.68 | - | -4.41 | -1.74 | 2.04 | 0.02 | 0.33 | -1.19 | 1.96 | 0.43 | -0.43 | -0.3 | 1.4 | 1.52 | -0.9 | -0.67 | 3.22 | -0.63 | -0.68 | -0.39 | 2.98 | -0.08 | -0.44 | -0.48 | 1.39 | 1.34 | 0.4 | -0.12 | 2.1 | 3.13 | -0.53 | -0.47 | 3.74 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
ROE % |
-78.43 | 35.18 | 187.99 | 36.94 | 15.57 | 19.87 | -77.25 | 30.99 | 57.60 | 65.93 | 39.07 | 76.78 | 33.33 | 47.36 | 44.28 | 39.75 | 58.27 | 21.83 | 57.66 | 89.66 | 57.34 | 66.23 | 51.96 | 37.69 | 23.42 | 42.33 | 83.98 | 125.62 | 167.27 | 205.84 | 262.06 | 318.28 | 374.51 | 268.76 | 141.39 | 26.34 | -31.78 | 17.37 | 38.77 | 47.85 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
ROA % |
2.30 | -7.10 | -17.65 | -22.10 | -9.49 | -9.28 | 0.93 | 3.29 | 2.82 | 3.54 | 1.97 | 3.69 | 2.45 | 4.45 | 3.74 | 3.05 | 6.41 | 2.53 | 6.18 | 9.40 | 5.55 | 6.38 | 5.22 | 4.06 | 2.90 | 5.85 | 12.68 | 19.51 | 26.33 | 28.39 | 29.73 | 31.06 | 32.39 | 24.28 | 14.37 | 4.88 | -2.60 | 0.61 | 1.36 | 1.68 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
ROCE % |
-105.56 | 2.14 | 162.62 | 41.62 | 50.16 | 85.53 | 13.20 | 112.17 | 116.27 | 118.05 | 84.47 | 112.95 | 57.40 | 50.47 | 41.77 | 32.22 | 53.99 | 49.16 | 51.25 | 55.17 | 51.83 | 50.86 | 54.72 | 50.68 | 25.56 | 36.05 | 47.53 | 53.23 | 45.85 | 48.47 | 40.60 | 34.01 | 69.36 | 69.36 | 66.73 | 70.82 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Current Ratio |
- | - | - | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
DSO |
- | - | - | 16.1 | - | 22.5 | 26.3 | 18.2 | 28.1 | 45.1 | 49.2 | 22.6 | 25.7 | 44.1 | 38.8 | 20.0 | 22.8 | 39.8 | 33.2 | 20.1 | 31.0 | 58.8 | 56.2 | 26.8 | 26.4 | 47.9 | 42.4 | 24.2 | 22.1 | 26.3 | 22.2 | 12.8 | 22.1 | 29.4 | 27.0 | 12.9 | 18.4 | 23.4 | 23.8 | 7.1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
DIO |
- | - | - | 19.6 | - | 27.0 | 27.0 | 21.9 | - | 71.8 | 71.7 | 29.4 | - | 50.1 | 44.0 | 21.8 | - | 40.7 | 34.0 | 22.9 | - | 67.1 | 65.3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
DPO |
- | - | - | 9.2 | - | 8.9 | 9.4 | 9.0 | - | 27.3 | 27.3 | 13.1 | - | 25.2 | 22.1 | 13.6 | - | 31.1 | 25.9 | 15.5 | - | 41.0 | 39.9 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Operating Cycle |
- | - | - | 35.8 | - | 49.5 | 53.4 | 40.1 | 28.1 | 116.9 | 120.9 | 52.0 | 25.7 | 94.2 | 82.8 | 41.8 | 22.8 | 80.5 | 67.2 | 43.0 | 31.0 | 125.9 | 121.6 | 26.8 | 26.4 | 47.9 | 42.4 | 24.2 | 22.1 | 26.3 | 22.2 | 12.8 | 22.1 | 29.4 | 27.0 | 12.9 | 18.4 | 23.4 | 23.8 | 7.1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Cash Conversion Cycle |
- | - | - | 26.6 | - | 40.6 | 44.0 | 31.2 | 28.1 | 89.6 | 93.6 | 38.9 | 25.7 | 69.0 | 60.6 | 28.1 | 22.8 | 49.5 | 41.3 | 27.5 | 31.0 | 84.9 | 81.7 | 26.8 | 26.4 | 47.9 | 42.4 | 24.2 | 22.1 | 26.3 | 22.2 | 12.8 | 22.1 | 29.4 | 27.0 | 12.9 | 18.4 | 23.4 | 23.8 | 7.1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
All numbers in USD currency
Multiples are an important financial analysis tool for the company Sprague Resources LP, allowing investors and analysts to quickly assess the company’s value and investment attractiveness based on the ratio of market indicators to the company’s financial performance. Essentially, multiples express how the market values the company relative to its earnings, revenue, equity, or other key metrics.
Advantages of Using Financial Ratios- Simplified Data Analysis
Financial ratios transform large volumes of accounting data into compact and easily interpretable indicators, significantly simplifying the assessment of the company’s condition. - Comparability Between Companies
Multiples standardize financial metrics, enabling objective comparison of companies of different sizes, industries, and market capitalizations. - Identification of Trends and Issues
Regular analysis of ratios helps track the dynamics of financial health, identify strengths and weaknesses of the business, as well as potential risks. - Decision Support
Financial multiples serve as an important tool for investors, creditors, and company management in making investment, credit, and managerial decisions. - Accelerated Assessment of Investment Attractiveness
Ratios allow quick determination of key performance, liquidity, and financial stability indicators, facilitating prompt evaluation of companies’ attractiveness for investments.
Using multiples enables comparison between companies, even if they differ in size or industry, as they standardize financial data into ratios convenient for analysis. This is especially useful for evaluating companies where direct analysis of financial statements may be complex or require in-depth knowledge.
Russia
USA
China
Brasil
