MarketCap
Facebook
X
Telegram
Acutus Medical Financial Ratios 2024-2011 | AFIB
Brief overview of Acutus Medical's valuation multiples
Current figures are compared with the company's own five-year history for 2020–2023.
The valuation comparison uses P/S 0.73x (median 2.51x), P/B 0.07x (median 0.54x). Multiples are on average 79.1% below their own medians. Shares look cheaper than their recent historical valuation.
Capital efficiency is characterized by ROE 82.4%, ROA -33.3%, ROCE 0.5%. Current return ratios are negative, materially weakening the fundamental profile.
PEG is 0.81x. Price is low relative to embedded growth, though the ratio depends heavily on forecast quality.
The cash cycle changed only slightly and ended at 193.5 days.
Conclusion
Acutus Medical's multiples look low against history, but fundamental returns do not yet provide convincing support.
Annual Financial Ratios Acutus Medical
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P/E |
- | -0.1 | -0.1 | -0.5 | -4.1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
P/S |
- | 0.7 | 1.7 | 3.3 | 49.2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
EPS |
-0.3 | -2.8 | -1.4 | -4.1 | -8.9 | -144.4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
EV (Enterprise Value) |
26.2 M | 40.9 M | 38 M | 97.3 M | 457 M | 322 M | 158 M | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
EBITDA per Share |
0.01 | -0.4 | 1.45 | -3.71 | -5.43 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
EV/EBITDA |
109.3 | -3.5 | 0.9 | -0.9 | -5.1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
PEG |
- | - | - | - | 0.81 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
P/B |
- | -6.0 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 3.3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
P/CF |
- | -0.1 | -0.1 | -0.6 | -4.3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
ROE % |
82.36 | 9290.44 | -52.81 | -111.31 | -80.56 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
ROA % |
-33.33 | -151.34 | -29.69 | -69.31 | -52.97 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
ROCE % |
0.49 | 1334.24 | 54.71 | -106.05 | -53.47 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Current Ratio |
0.7 | 1.0 | 2.3 | 2.7 | 6.9 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
DSO |
174.1 | 745.7 | 1297.7 | 61.2 | 93.1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
DIO |
57.8 | 107.6 | 672.3 | 162.8 | 297.7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
DPO |
38.5 | 92.7 | 369.1 | 87.5 | 189.9 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Operating Cycle |
232.0 | 853.3 | 1970.0 | 224.0 | 390.8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Cash Conversion Cycle |
193.5 | 760.5 | 1600.9 | 136.5 | 200.9 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
All numbers in USD currency
Quarterly Financial Ratios Acutus Medical
| 2024-Q3 | 2024-Q2 | 2024-Q1 | 2023-Q4 | 2023-Q3 | 2023-Q2 | 2023-Q1 | 2022-Q4 | 2022-Q3 | 2022-Q2 | 2022-Q1 | 2021-Q4 | 2021-Q3 | 2021-Q2 | 2021-Q1 | 2020-Q4 | 2020-Q3 | 2020-Q2 | 2020-Q1 | 2019-Q4 | 2019-Q3 | 2019-Q2 | 2019-Q1 | 2018-Q4 | 2018-Q3 | 2018-Q2 | 2018-Q1 | 2017-Q4 | 2017-Q3 | 2017-Q2 | 2017-Q1 | 2016-Q4 | 2016-Q3 | 2016-Q2 | 2016-Q1 | 2015-Q4 | 2015-Q3 | 2015-Q2 | 2015-Q1 | 2014-Q4 | 2014-Q3 | 2014-Q2 | 2014-Q1 | 2013-Q4 | 2013-Q3 | 2013-Q2 | 2013-Q1 | 2012-Q4 | 2012-Q3 | 2012-Q2 | 2012-Q1 | 2011-Q4 | 2011-Q3 | 2011-Q2 | 2011-Q1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPS |
-0.19 | -0.03 | -0.06 | - | -0.45 | -0.63 | -0.57 | - | -0.72 | 0.16 | -1.42 | - | -0.94 | -1.02 | -1.04 | - | -1.95 | -32.24 | -25.84 | - | -47.21 | -45.7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
EBITDA per Share |
0.02 | 0.01 | -0.02 | - | -0.41 | -0.55 | -0.56 | - | -0.67 | 0.58 | -1.32 | - | -0.84 | -0.92 | -0.95 | - | -1.58 | -26.2 | -24.5 | - | -45.1 | -20.1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
ROE % |
72.01 | -24.37 | -70.38 | -110.67 | -146.02 | -96.81 | -113.07 | -86.09 | -107.41 | -109.93 | -146.50 | -88.30 | -108.80 | -78.69 | -55.11 | -26.01 | -11.80 | 22.14 | -14.30 | - | 14.21 | 13.44 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
ROA % |
-39.52 | -40.38 | -51.87 | -47.98 | -65.80 | -46.04 | -58.15 | -44.08 | -58.52 | -61.14 | -83.29 | -52.89 | -67.62 | -85.37 | -74.34 | -56.32 | -86.75 | -100.80 | -9.40 | - | -30.43 | -28.78 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
ROCE % |
-37.51 | -72.02 | -94.38 | -108.68 | -144.09 | -83.81 | -100.74 | -72.12 | -92.38 | -92.96 | -140.19 | -84.01 | -101.22 | -73.58 | -51.50 | -23.73 | -9.93 | 13.42 | -13.90 | - | 13.80 | 6.14 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Current Ratio |
0.8 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 2.3 | 2.0 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 2.6 | 3.1 | 2.2 | 2.6 | 2.9 | 3.5 | 0.9 | 2.9 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
DSO |
166.4 | 187.8 | 240.4 | - | 144.8 | 112.2 | 289.1 | - | 72.7 | 62.4 | 81.9 | - | 74.9 | 56.5 | 58.9 | - | 39.6 | 121.5 | 69.8 | - | 37.1 | 16.4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
DIO |
87.7 | 113.3 | 126.9 | - | 166.7 | 173.2 | 189.9 | - | 196.3 | 154.9 | 223.7 | - | 158.3 | 173.6 | 175.8 | - | 205.9 | 432.2 | 305.4 | - | 339.1 | 157.8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
DPO |
31.6 | 49.5 | 74.0 | - | 54.4 | 62.6 | 69.1 | - | 82.8 | 60.0 | 80.8 | - | 65.2 | 72.5 | 94.3 | - | 122.5 | 297.3 | 173.5 | - | 156.3 | 72.7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Operating Cycle |
254.1 | 301.1 | 367.3 | - | 822.9 | 944.5 | 1581.6 | - | 269.0 | 217.3 | 305.6 | - | 233.2 | 230.1 | 234.7 | - | 292.1 | 617.8 | 375.3 | - | 376.2 | 174.2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Cash Conversion Cycle |
222.4 | 251.6 | 293.4 | - | 674.5 | 744.7 | 1359.2 | - | 186.2 | 157.3 | 224.8 | - | 167.9 | 157.6 | 140.4 | - | 145.4 | 334.6 | 201.7 | - | 220.0 | 101.5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
All numbers in USD currency
Multiples are an important financial analysis tool for the company Acutus Medical, allowing investors and analysts to quickly assess the company’s value and investment attractiveness based on the ratio of market indicators to the company’s financial performance. Essentially, multiples express how the market values the company relative to its earnings, revenue, equity, or other key metrics.
Advantages of Using Financial Ratios- Simplified Data Analysis
Financial ratios transform large volumes of accounting data into compact and easily interpretable indicators, significantly simplifying the assessment of the company’s condition. - Comparability Between Companies
Multiples standardize financial metrics, enabling objective comparison of companies of different sizes, industries, and market capitalizations. - Identification of Trends and Issues
Regular analysis of ratios helps track the dynamics of financial health, identify strengths and weaknesses of the business, as well as potential risks. - Decision Support
Financial multiples serve as an important tool for investors, creditors, and company management in making investment, credit, and managerial decisions. - Accelerated Assessment of Investment Attractiveness
Ratios allow quick determination of key performance, liquidity, and financial stability indicators, facilitating prompt evaluation of companies’ attractiveness for investments.
Using multiples enables comparison between companies, even if they differ in size or industry, as they standardize financial data into ratios convenient for analysis. This is especially useful for evaluating companies where direct analysis of financial statements may be complex or require in-depth knowledge.
USA
France
China
Israel
Canada
Australia
Britain
