MarketCap
Facebook
X
Telegram
EDAP TMS S.A. Financial Ratios 2025-2008 | EDAP
Brief overview of EDAP TMS S.A.'s valuation and returns
Ratios are assessed across five available annual reports in the 2016–2021 interval.
The latest available valuation ratios are P/E 321.34x (median 72.92x), EV/EBITDA 730.21x (median 121.79x), P/S 0.94x (median 4.7x). The combined multiple level is about 55.5% below the company's historical norm, suggesting more cautious expectations.
The inverse P/E implies an earnings yield of 0.3%. This is not a dividend yield, but current earnings relative to market price.
End-period return metrics are ROE -46.5%, ROA -22.1%, ROCE -50.2%. The business is not generating positive returns on invested resources. Valuation should be read cautiously until earnings recover.
A longer cycle, from 121.1 days to 151.5 days, indicates slower release of cash from operations.
Conclusion
EDAP TMS S.A.'s restrained price comes with modest current quality. Better efficiency is needed for revaluation.
Annual Financial Ratios EDAP TMS S.A.
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P/E |
- | -3.2 | -13.2 | -90.3 | 321.3 | -131.9 | 72.9 | -228.2 | -109.2 | 20.0 | -45.2 | -119.1 | -10.7 | -5.3 | -30.0 | -2.7 | -2.1 | - |
P/S |
- | 0.9 | 4.6 | 4.8 | 5.1 | 4.7 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 0.7 | - |
EPS |
- | -0.5 | -0.6 | -0.1 | 0.0 | -0.1 | 0.1 | -0.0 | -0.0 | 0.1 | -0.1 | -0.0 | -0.2 | -0.4 | -0.1 | -1.0 | - | - |
EV (Enterprise Value) |
139 M | 75.4 M | 271 M | 231 M | 252 M | 229 M | 115 M | 81.4 M | 76.2 M | 90.6 M | 99.2 M | 77.6 M | 74.1 M | 61.9 M | 52 M | 53.5 M | 4.6 M | -13.8 M |
EBITDA per Share |
- | -0.48 | -0.48 | -0.08 | 0.01 | 0.08 | 0.14 | 0.01 | -0.02 | 0.0509 | 0.0595 | -0.0355 | -0.0765 | -0.0627 | -0.0812 | -0.2 | -0.13 | - |
EV/EBITDA |
- | -4.2 | -15.2 | -87.2 | 730.2 | 121.8 | 23.3 | 209.3 | -131.7 | 49.9 | 52.8 | -75.5 | -37.5 | -42.5 | -35.0 | -20.7 | -3.3 | - |
PEG |
- | 0.03 | -0.09 | -3.77 | 1.83 | -0.69 | 0.5 | 1.82 | 1.21 | 0.07 | 0.18 | -1.3 | -0.24 | 0.01 | -0.32 | - | - | - |
P/B |
- | 1.5 | 4.9 | 3.7 | 4.5 | 8.6 | 4.0 | 3.1 | 3.0 | 3.1 | 5.2 | 4.0 | 5.8 | 4.9 | 3.2 | 3.8 | - | - |
P/CF |
- | -4.4 | -19.1 | -87.6 | 50.6 | 113.7 | 29.0 | 440.8 | -24.3 | 139.8 | 76.5 | -61.4 | -23.2 | -97.7 | -20.6 | -8.9 | -4.4 | - |
ROE % |
- | -46.50 | -37.20 | -4.09 | 1.40 | -6.49 | 5.53 | -1.35 | -2.71 | 15.71 | -11.55 | -3.38 | -54.08 | -91.59 | -10.77 | -142.89 | -61.74 | - |
ROA % |
- | -22.10 | -23.13 | -2.90 | 0.91 | -3.09 | 2.85 | -0.69 | -1.45 | 8.25 | -4.32 | -1.59 | -18.68 | -24.55 | -2.88 | -35.39 | - | - |
ROCE % |
- | -50.21 | -34.81 | -5.94 | -3.22 | 0.80 | 6.19 | -4.12 | -6.59 | 1.24 | 2.18 | -8.69 | -18.02 | -11.73 | -21.06 | -42.90 | -25.46 | - |
Current Ratio |
- | 1.9 | 2.6 | 3.4 | 2.8 | 1.9 | 2.1 | 2.0 | 2.2 | 2.7 | 2.0 | 2.2 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1.3 | 1.3 | - | - |
DSO |
- | 103.8 | 94.5 | 80.4 | 91.8 | 86.4 | 94.4 | 108.4 | 106.2 | 102.8 | 133.1 | 111.0 | 142.4 | 167.4 | 262.2 | 118.9 | - | - |
DIO |
- | 163.3 | 136.3 | 113.8 | 110.2 | 126.7 | 117.5 | 114.3 | 128.7 | 152.7 | 121.6 | 138.4 | 116.2 | 99.5 | 106.5 | 50.2 | - | - |
DPO |
- | 115.6 | 90.6 | 39.2 | 40.6 | 92.0 | 94.0 | 102.5 | 106.2 | 105.7 | 111.5 | 120.8 | 122.6 | 135.9 | 117.7 | 75.5 | - | - |
Operating Cycle |
- | 267.1 | 230.8 | 194.2 | 202.1 | 213.1 | 211.9 | 222.7 | 234.9 | 255.4 | 254.7 | 249.3 | 258.5 | 267.0 | 368.7 | 169.0 | - | - |
Cash Conversion Cycle |
- | 151.5 | 140.2 | 155.0 | 161.4 | 121.1 | 117.9 | 120.2 | 128.7 | 149.7 | 143.2 | 128.6 | 135.9 | 131.1 | 251.0 | 93.5 | - | - |
All numbers in EUR currency
Quarterly Financial Ratios EDAP TMS S.A.
| 2026-Q1 | 2025-Q4 | 2024-Q4 | 2023-Q4 | 2022-Q4 | 2022-Q3 | 2022-Q2 | 2022-Q1 | 2021-Q4 | 2021-Q3 | 2021-Q2 | 2021-Q1 | 2020-Q4 | 2020-Q3 | 2020-Q2 | 2020-Q1 | 2019-Q4 | 2019-Q3 | 2019-Q2 | 2019-Q1 | 2018-Q4 | 2018-Q3 | 2018-Q2 | 2018-Q1 | 2017-Q4 | 2017-Q3 | 2017-Q2 | 2017-Q1 | 2016-Q4 | 2016-Q3 | 2016-Q2 | 2016-Q1 | 2015-Q4 | 2015-Q3 | 2015-Q2 | 2015-Q1 | 2014-Q4 | 2014-Q3 | 2014-Q2 | 2014-Q1 | 2013-Q4 | 2013-Q3 | 2013-Q2 | 2013-Q1 | 2012-Q4 | 2012-Q3 | 2012-Q2 | 2012-Q1 | 2011-Q4 | 2011-Q3 | 2011-Q2 | 2011-Q1 | 2010-Q4 | 2009-Q4 | 2008-Q4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPS |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | -0.98 | - | - |
EBITDA per Share |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | -0.2 | -0.13 | - |
ROE % |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | -142.89 | -61.74 | - |
ROA % |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | -35.39 | - | - |
ROCE % |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | -42.90 | -25.46 | - |
Current Ratio |
- | - | 1.9 | 2.6 | 3.4 | - | - | - | 2.8 | - | - | - | 1.9 | - | - | - | 2.1 | - | - | - | 2.0 | - | 2.1 | - | 2.2 | - | 2.2 | - | 2.1 | - | 2.1 | - | 1.6 | - | 1.6 | - | 1.9 | - | - | - | 1.5 | - | - | - | 1.4 | - | 1.4 | - | 1.4 | - | - | - | 1.3 | - | - |
DSO |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 29.7 | - | - |
DIO |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 12.5 | - | - |
DPO |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 18.9 | - | - |
All numbers in EUR currency
Multiples are an important financial analysis tool for the company EDAP TMS S.A., allowing investors and analysts to quickly assess the company’s value and investment attractiveness based on the ratio of market indicators to the company’s financial performance. Essentially, multiples express how the market values the company relative to its earnings, revenue, equity, or other key metrics.
Advantages of Using Financial Ratios- Simplified Data Analysis
Financial ratios transform large volumes of accounting data into compact and easily interpretable indicators, significantly simplifying the assessment of the company’s condition. - Comparability Between Companies
Multiples standardize financial metrics, enabling objective comparison of companies of different sizes, industries, and market capitalizations. - Identification of Trends and Issues
Regular analysis of ratios helps track the dynamics of financial health, identify strengths and weaknesses of the business, as well as potential risks. - Decision Support
Financial multiples serve as an important tool for investors, creditors, and company management in making investment, credit, and managerial decisions. - Accelerated Assessment of Investment Attractiveness
Ratios allow quick determination of key performance, liquidity, and financial stability indicators, facilitating prompt evaluation of companies’ attractiveness for investments.
Using multiples enables comparison between companies, even if they differ in size or industry, as they standardize financial data into ratios convenient for analysis. This is especially useful for evaluating companies where direct analysis of financial statements may be complex or require in-depth knowledge.
USA
China
Israel
Britain
Canada
