
Full House Resorts Financial Ratios 2025-2009 | FLL
Brief overview of Full House Resorts's market valuation
This overview follows the five latest available observations from 2010 through 2021.
The valuation comparison uses P/E 22.22x (median 22.22x), EV/EBITDA 15.3x (median 15.3x), P/S 0.31x (median 0.69x). Ratios sit near their own comparison base, with an average deviation of 0% from five-year medians.
At the current P/E, inverse earnings yield is 4.5%, a useful bridge between price and business earnings.
The latest available business-quality ratios are ROE -15.8%, ROA -6.2%, ROCE 123.1%. Losses and negative capital returns make ordinary P/E-like references unstable or inapplicable.
On PEG (1.14x), the market prices growth without an obvious discount or excessive premium.
The cash cycle accelerated by 116.2 days to -106.4 days. Less capital is tied up in operations.
Conclusion
Full House Resorts trades near its familiar ratio range. A new earnings or profitability trend is needed to change the view.
Annual Financial Ratios Full House Resorts
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P/E |
-2.3 | -2.2 | -6.7 | -11.2 | 22.2 | 1050.6 | -14.6 | -14.0 | -15.3 | -8.9 | -22.9 | -1.3 | -12.7 | 2.3 | 23.4 | 7.3 | - |
P/S |
0.3 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.5 | - | - |
EPS |
-1.1 | -1.2 | -0.7 | -0.4 | 0.4 | 0.0 | -0.2 | -0.2 | -0.2 | -0.3 | -0.1 | -1.1 | -0.2 | 1.5 | - | - | - |
EV (Enterprise Value) |
700 M | 683 M | 741 M | 605 M | 533 M | 273 M | 212 M | 163 M | 178 M | 139 M | 102 M | 95 M | 112 M | 124 M | 79.3 M | 46 M | -9.2 M |
EBITDA per Share |
1.27 | 1.28 | 0.87 | 0.6 | 1.38 | 0.695 | 0.539 | 0.611 | 0.685 | 0.738 | 0.649 | 0.366 | 0.829 | 0.78 | 1.61 | 1.5 | - |
EV/EBITDA |
15.3 | 15.2 | 24.8 | 29.3 | 11.9 | 11.9 | 11.0 | 8.5 | 9.7 | 7.9 | 6.5 | 9.9 | 5.7 | 7.3 | 2.2 | 1.7 | - |
PEG |
-0.09 | -0.07 | -0.32 | -1.16 | 1.14 | 10.05 | 0.5 | -0.62 | -0.99 | 0.03 | -0.24 | 0.0 | 0.11 | 0.0 | -0.34 | - | - |
P/B |
36.6 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 1.7 | 2.3 | 2.7 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.1 | - |
P/CF |
9.3 | 6.5 | 7.4 | 37.8 | 8.8 | 24.3 | 35.8 | -8.5 | -19.6 | -1.9 | -7.8 | -13.6 | 8.7 | -7.4 | 2.3 | 3.1 | - |
ROE % |
-1583.81 | -100.43 | -31.99 | -14.84 | 10.39 | 0.26 | -10.38 | -7.32 | -9.66 | -9.02 | -2.33 | -36.25 | -5.09 | 34.31 | 4.23 | 16.24 | - |
ROA % |
-6.19 | -6.04 | -3.62 | -2.49 | 2.47 | 0.07 | -2.75 | -2.40 | -2.90 | -2.87 | -0.92 | -14.79 | -2.57 | 17.10 | 2.48 | 13.59 | - |
ROCE % |
123.09 | 6.79 | -1.49 | 12.71 | 33.32 | 5.92 | 3.34 | 4.67 | 4.56 | 4.12 | 4.03 | -1.56 | 4.89 | 5.73 | 31.11 | 49.86 | - |
Current Ratio |
1.0 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.9 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.8 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 1.4 | 15.4 | - |
DSO |
5.3 | 6.5 | 7.1 | 9.8 | 9.7 | 14.3 | 4.9 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 4.8 | 5.0 | 14.0 | 4.7 | 7.5 | 16.8 | - | - |
DIO |
36.7 | 31.6 | 31.2 | - | - | 9.4 | 8.9 | 5.3 | 6.7 | 6.0 | 6.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
DPO |
148.4 | 170.2 | 163.7 | - | - | 26.0 | 20.3 | 22.0 | 20.6 | 22.3 | 19.7 | 22.3 | 11.9 | 12.4 | 11.5 | - | - |
Operating Cycle |
42.0 | 38.1 | 38.4 | 9.8 | 9.7 | 23.6 | 13.8 | 9.8 | 10.7 | 10.8 | 11.0 | 14.0 | 4.7 | 7.5 | 16.8 | - | - |
Cash Conversion Cycle |
-106.4 | -132.1 | -125.4 | 9.8 | 9.7 | -2.4 | -6.5 | -12.2 | -9.9 | -11.5 | -8.7 | -8.3 | -7.2 | -4.9 | 5.4 | - | - |
All numbers in USD currency
Quarterly Financial Ratios Full House Resorts
| 2026-Q1 | 2025-Q3 | 2025-Q2 | 2025-Q1 | 2024-Q4 | 2024-Q3 | 2024-Q2 | 2024-Q1 | 2023-Q4 | 2023-Q3 | 2023-Q2 | 2023-Q1 | 2022-Q4 | 2022-Q3 | 2022-Q2 | 2022-Q1 | 2021-Q4 | 2021-Q3 | 2021-Q2 | 2021-Q1 | 2020-Q4 | 2020-Q3 | 2020-Q2 | 2020-Q1 | 2019-Q4 | 2019-Q3 | 2019-Q2 | 2019-Q1 | 2018-Q4 | 2018-Q3 | 2018-Q2 | 2018-Q1 | 2017-Q4 | 2017-Q3 | 2017-Q2 | 2017-Q1 | 2016-Q4 | 2016-Q3 | 2016-Q2 | 2016-Q1 | 2015-Q4 | 2015-Q3 | 2015-Q2 | 2015-Q1 | 2014-Q4 | 2014-Q3 | 2014-Q2 | 2014-Q1 | 2013-Q4 | 2013-Q3 | 2013-Q2 | 2013-Q1 | 2012-Q4 | 2012-Q3 | 2012-Q2 | 2012-Q1 | 2011-Q4 | 2011-Q3 | 2011-Q2 | 2011-Q1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPS |
-0.23 | -0.21 | -0.29 | -0.27 | - | -0.24 | -0.25 | -0.33 | - | 0.13 | -0.16 | -0.33 | - | - | -0.13 | - | - | 0.13 | 0.16 | -0.13 | - | 0.28 | -0.25 | -0.16 | - | 0.03 | -0.04 | -0.06 | - | 0.06 | -0.02 | -0.18 | - | 0.03 | -0.07 | -0.03 | - | 0.01 | -0.12 | -0.02 | - | 0.11 | -0.02 | -0.09 | - | -0.04 | -0.45 | -0.06 | - | 0.11 | - | 0.03 | - | 0.11 | 0.04 | - | - | - | - | - |
EBITDA per Share |
0.36 | 0.39 | 0.58 | 0.32 | - | 0.96 | 0.36 | 0.29 | - | 0.95 | 0.42 | -0.03 | - | - | 0.34 | 0.21 | - | 0.38 | 0.46 | 0.31 | - | 0.6 | -0.01 | -0.05 | - | 0.36 | 0.23 | 0.12 | - | 0.37 | 0.23 | 0.1 | - | 0.45 | 0.24 | 0.19 | - | 0.44 | 0.23 | 0.16 | - | 0.29 | 0.16 | 0.1 | - | 0.27 | -0.49 | 0.13 | - | 0.07 | 0.23 | - | - | 0.23 | 0.16 | - | - | 0.2 | 0.49 | 0.37 |
ROE % |
17.84 | -150.84 | -111.31 | -79.12 | -47.62 | -42.49 | -32.78 | -31.07 | -14.32 | -18.30 | -23.33 | -12.38 | 0.42 | 0.42 | 5.78 | 6.18 | 6.09 | 19.69 | 3.56 | -9.49 | -5.92 | -4.24 | -19.64 | -10.70 | -3.01 | -0.46 | -3.24 | -8.61 | -5.73 | -4.21 | -9.69 | -9.74 | -2.57 | -2.33 | -8.10 | -5.75 | -4.59 | -0.99 | -1.99 | -0.84 | -0.26 | -1.59 | -19.96 | -21.09 | -17.98 | -20.67 | -19.39 | -3.92 | -2.04 | 0.52 | 4.13 | 36.04 | 35.34 | 33.07 | 33.29 | 35.57 | 3.71 | -2.27 | 2.78 | 3.20 |
ROA % |
-5.56 | -5.54 | -5.63 | -5.71 | -4.23 | -3.54 | -3.11 | -3.52 | -1.84 | -2.59 | -3.26 | -1.44 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 1.42 | 1.41 | 1.40 | 5.02 | 0.89 | -2.34 | -1.58 | -1.13 | -5.24 | -2.85 | -0.80 | 0.06 | -0.75 | -2.62 | -1.86 | -1.40 | -3.14 | -3.12 | -0.77 | -0.70 | -2.50 | -1.81 | -1.46 | -0.03 | -0.40 | -0.29 | -0.10 | -0.65 | -8.11 | -8.58 | -7.34 | -8.73 | -8.21 | -1.82 | -1.05 | 0.23 | 2.08 | 17.99 | 17.62 | 16.41 | 16.61 | 17.86 | 1.97 | -1.20 | 1.48 | 1.70 |
ROCE % |
-17.71 | 30.94 | 10.65 | 10.10 | 7.72 | 19.28 | 15.26 | 3.53 | 4.43 | 11.94 | 5.06 | 14.71 | 22.55 | 22.55 | 34.47 | 35.98 | 31.30 | 49.67 | 31.96 | 13.98 | 4.97 | 11.02 | -3.92 | 5.69 | 11.74 | 17.83 | 15.13 | 12.61 | 10.35 | 18.02 | 14.50 | 15.49 | 14.58 | 19.72 | 13.56 | 13.70 | 9.36 | 15.13 | 11.84 | 10.31 | 7.60 | 12.22 | -13.76 | -15.78 | -15.75 | -17.28 | -19.30 | 4.71 | 4.87 | 8.57 | 11.90 | 66.39 | 62.60 | 65.74 | 75.61 | 85.41 | 28.31 | 3.14 | 13.58 | 11.59 |
Current Ratio |
1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.2 | - | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.4 |
DSO |
3.9 | 4.4 | 5.8 | 6.1 | - | 6.8 | 6.6 | 6.8 | - | 9.2 | 9.1 | 8.9 | - | - | 14.6 | 11.1 | - | 7.7 | 6.9 | 9.4 | - | 10.7 | 30.8 | 10.5 | - | 4.5 | 4.8 | 4.8 | - | 4.2 | 4.5 | 4.6 | - | 3.7 | 4.0 | 4.2 | - | 4.2 | 5.0 | 5.2 | - | 4.6 | 5.1 | 5.2 | - | 4.4 | 4.6 | 5.2 | - | 4.5 | 4.7 | 5.3 | - | 8.1 | 8.7 | 10.3 | - | 13.3 | 14.3 | - |
DIO |
33.0 | 33.3 | 39.9 | 38.4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
DPO |
111.1 | 101.2 | 116.3 | 135.1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Operating Cycle |
- | 37.5 | - | - | - | - | 6.7 | - | - | - | - | 8.9 | - | - | 14.6 | 11.1 | - | 7.7 | 6.9 | 9.4 | - | 10.7 | 30.8 | 10.5 | - | 4.5 | 4.8 | 4.8 | - | 4.2 | 4.5 | 4.6 | - | 3.7 | 4.0 | 4.2 | - | 4.2 | 5.0 | 5.2 | - | 4.6 | 5.1 | 5.2 | - | 4.4 | 4.6 | 5.2 | - | 4.5 | 4.7 | 5.3 | - | 8.1 | 8.7 | 10.3 | - | 13.3 | 14.3 | - |
Cash Conversion Cycle |
- | -83.8 | - | - | - | - | 6.7 | - | - | - | - | 8.9 | - | - | 14.6 | 11.1 | - | 7.7 | 6.9 | 9.4 | - | 10.7 | 30.8 | 10.5 | - | 4.5 | 4.8 | 4.8 | - | 4.2 | 4.5 | 4.6 | - | 3.7 | 4.0 | 4.2 | - | 4.2 | 5.0 | 5.2 | - | 4.6 | 5.1 | 5.2 | - | 4.4 | 4.6 | 5.2 | - | 4.5 | 4.7 | 5.3 | - | 8.1 | 8.7 | 10.3 | - | 13.3 | 14.3 | - |
All numbers in USD currency
Multiples are an important financial analysis tool for the company Full House Resorts, allowing investors and analysts to quickly assess the company’s value and investment attractiveness based on the ratio of market indicators to the company’s financial performance. Essentially, multiples express how the market values the company relative to its earnings, revenue, equity, or other key metrics.
Advantages of Using Financial Ratios- Simplified Data Analysis
Financial ratios transform large volumes of accounting data into compact and easily interpretable indicators, significantly simplifying the assessment of the company’s condition. - Comparability Between Companies
Multiples standardize financial metrics, enabling objective comparison of companies of different sizes, industries, and market capitalizations. - Identification of Trends and Issues
Regular analysis of ratios helps track the dynamics of financial health, identify strengths and weaknesses of the business, as well as potential risks. - Decision Support
Financial multiples serve as an important tool for investors, creditors, and company management in making investment, credit, and managerial decisions. - Accelerated Assessment of Investment Attractiveness
Ratios allow quick determination of key performance, liquidity, and financial stability indicators, facilitating prompt evaluation of companies’ attractiveness for investments.
Using multiples enables comparison between companies, even if they differ in size or industry, as they standardize financial data into ratios convenient for analysis. This is especially useful for evaluating companies where direct analysis of financial statements may be complex or require in-depth knowledge.