MarketCap
Facebook
X
Telegram
SeaSpine Holdings Corporation Financial Ratios 2021-2011 | SPNE
Brief overview of SeaSpine Holdings Corporation's market valuation
The comparison uses the five latest available annual observations between 2017 and 2021.
The valuation comparison uses P/S 2.22x (median 3.34x), P/B 1.36x (median 1.66x). The current ratio basket stands about 25.6% below the five-year comparison base. Earnings and risk trends should explain the discount.
The latest available business-quality ratios are ROE -17.4%, ROA -14.4%, ROCE -19.5%. Negative returns point to losses or poor capital efficiency. Valuation multiples are less informative in this setting.
PEG is 0.71x. Price is low relative to embedded growth, though the ratio depends heavily on forecast quality.
Cash turnover speed was broadly preserved, with the cycle moving from 301.1 days to 299.4 days.
Overall assessment
SeaSpine Holdings Corporation's restrained price comes with modest current quality. Better efficiency is needed for revaluation.
Annual Financial Ratios SeaSpine Holdings Corporation
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P/E |
-7.8 | -11.9 | -31.2 | -24.7 | -16.7 | -8.1 | -2.5 | - | - | - | - |
P/S |
2.2 | 3.3 | 6.1 | 6.2 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1.0 | - | - | - | - |
EPS |
-1.6 | -1.6 | -0.5 | -0.5 | -0.6 | -0.9 | -5.0 | -2.2 | -2.3 | - | - |
EV (Enterprise Value) |
408 M | 481 M | 280 M | 242 M | 144 M | 101 M | 134 M | 47.7 M | 41.4 M | - | - |
EBITDA per Share |
-1.4 | -1.2 | -1.52 | -1.46 | -1.75 | -2.83 | -3.61 | -0.67 | -0.35 | - | - |
EV/EBITDA |
-8.7 | -14.7 | -9.7 | -10.8 | -6.6 | -3.2 | -3.4 | -6.5 | -10.7 | - | - |
PEG |
0.71 | 0.64 | -0.43 | -0.27 | -0.13 | -0.08 | 0.02 | - | - | - | - |
P/B |
1.4 | 3.0 | 2.4 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.9 | - | - | - | - |
P/CF |
-12.7 | -20.9 | -13.2 | -18.8 | -14.6 | -5.6 | -4.3 | - | - | - | - |
ROE % |
-17.40 | -25.15 | -7.82 | -6.70 | -7.11 | -8.80 | -37.69 | -26.89 | -23.09 | - | - |
ROA % |
-14.41 | -20.14 | -6.06 | -5.53 | -5.58 | -6.64 | -31.48 | -17.58 | -16.77 | - | - |
ROCE % |
-19.52 | -23.64 | -35.26 | -22.73 | -29.34 | -35.44 | -34.70 | -21.72 | -15.16 | - | - |
Current Ratio |
5.8 | 5.0 | 4.4 | 5.7 | 4.7 | 4.1 | 6.1 | 2.9 | 3.7 | - | - |
DSO |
59.5 | 60.4 | 188.8 | 202.6 | 59.3 | 65.6 | 65.6 | 29.7 | - | - | - |
DIO |
300.0 | 324.9 | 283.0 | 275.4 | 293.8 | 297.7 | 306.2 | - | - | - | - |
DPO |
60.1 | 40.0 | 52.4 | 54.1 | 52.0 | 56.1 | 81.8 | - | - | - | - |
Operating Cycle |
359.4 | 385.3 | 471.7 | 478.0 | 353.2 | 363.3 | 371.8 | 29.7 | - | - | - |
Cash Conversion Cycle |
299.4 | 345.3 | 419.3 | 423.9 | 301.1 | 307.2 | 290.0 | 29.7 | - | - | - |
All numbers in USD currency
Quarterly Financial Ratios SeaSpine Holdings Corporation
| 2022-Q4 | 2022-Q3 | 2022-Q2 | 2022-Q1 | 2021-Q4 | 2021-Q3 | 2021-Q2 | 2021-Q1 | 2020-Q4 | 2020-Q3 | 2020-Q2 | 2020-Q1 | 2019-Q4 | 2019-Q3 | 2019-Q2 | 2019-Q1 | 2018-Q4 | 2018-Q3 | 2018-Q2 | 2018-Q1 | 2017-Q4 | 2017-Q3 | 2017-Q2 | 2017-Q1 | 2016-Q4 | 2016-Q3 | 2016-Q2 | 2016-Q1 | 2015-Q4 | 2015-Q3 | 2015-Q2 | 2015-Q1 | 2014-Q4 | 2014-Q3 | 2014-Q2 | 2014-Q1 | 2013-Q4 | 2013-Q3 | 2013-Q2 | 2013-Q1 | 2012-Q4 | 2012-Q3 | 2012-Q2 | 2012-Q1 | 2011-Q4 | 2011-Q3 | 2011-Q2 | 2011-Q1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPS |
- | -0.42 | -0.38 | -0.45 | - | -0.48 | -0.16 | -0.46 | -0.37 | -0.24 | -0.5 | -0.48 | -0.45 | -0.51 | -0.64 | -0.48 | -0.53 | -0.65 | -0.5 | -0.5 | -0.56 | -0.58 | -0.68 | -0.79 | -0.87 | -0.84 | -1.07 | -1.08 | -1.23 | -1.27 | -1.6 | -0.9 | -0.75 | -0.48 | -0.49 | -0.5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
EBITDA per Share |
- | -0.05 | -0.16 | -0.34 | - | -0.22 | -0.16 | -0.35 | - | 0.05 | -0.31 | -0.38 | - | -0.07 | -0.35 | -0.33 | - | -0.1 | -0.13 | -0.31 | - | 0.04 | -0.23 | -0.55 | - | -0.05 | -0.53 | -0.82 | - | -1.29 | -0.92 | -0.48 | - | 0.49 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
ROE % |
-16.10 | -21.50 | -17.39 | -20.52 | -14.92 | -20.94 | -19.23 | -25.32 | -23.95 | -25.75 | -30.41 | -32.50 | -32.64 | -31.52 | -33.28 | -30.82 | -30.67 | -31.07 | -27.68 | -28.06 | -29.99 | -31.69 | -32.87 | -34.66 | -34.86 | -35.39 | -36.41 | -39.00 | -36.97 | -36.67 | -33.57 | -27.52 | -9.03 | -5.82 | -5.95 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
ROA % |
-12.13 | -16.64 | -13.81 | -15.72 | -11.35 | -16.18 | -14.62 | -19.39 | -19.38 | -20.61 | -24.11 | -25.71 | -25.65 | -25.12 | -25.86 | -23.66 | -23.50 | -23.55 | -21.65 | -21.85 | -23.07 | -24.13 | -24.74 | -26.81 | -27.62 | -28.78 | -30.47 | -32.77 | -31.05 | -29.15 | -25.35 | -19.21 | -5.90 | -3.81 | -3.89 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
ROCE % |
-16.09 | -21.68 | -19.62 | -22.42 | -16.75 | -20.48 | -22.51 | -25.92 | -18.05 | -26.12 | -32.08 | -31.25 | -24.54 | -34.57 | -33.55 | -30.43 | -23.64 | -30.61 | -28.34 | -29.80 | -23.25 | -31.19 | -33.79 | -34.98 | -26.46 | -35.68 | -38.66 | -34.73 | -25.78 | -30.65 | -26.93 | -5.64 | - | -4.87 | -5.49 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Current Ratio |
- | 3.8 | 3.9 | 4.5 | 5.8 | 6.2 | 6.7 | 3.2 | 5.0 | 5.1 | 4.9 | 6.0 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.8 | 5.2 | 5.7 | 3.5 | 4.1 | 5.1 | 4.7 | 4.7 | 3.9 | 4.2 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 5.6 | 6.2 | 6.1 | 6.8 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 2.9 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
DSO |
- | 49.9 | 57.1 | 65.1 | - | 57.7 | 52.6 | 55.7 | 48.6 | 46.7 | 65.2 | 56.7 | 50.7 | 53.5 | 50.9 | 51.9 | 49.2 | 52.9 | 52.0 | 58.5 | - | 59.7 | 54.8 | 57.8 | - | 63.3 | 62.9 | 70.1 | - | 70.7 | 69.1 | 67.6 | - | 61.2 | 28.8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
DIO |
- | 291.0 | 387.5 | 333.3 | - | 340.4 | 322.8 | 333.2 | - | 331.6 | 384.7 | 313.3 | - | 300.6 | 293.4 | 295.4 | - | 273.5 | 268.6 | 318.4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
DPO |
- | 63.4 | 85.2 | 82.4 | - | 86.6 | 75.2 | 50.8 | - | 62.9 | 87.4 | 61.1 | - | 78.8 | 85.6 | 76.5 | - | 67.3 | 56.7 | 56.5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Operating Cycle |
- | 170.3 | - | 398.3 | - | 398.1 | 375.4 | 388.9 | 51.4 | 405.6 | 506.4 | 398.8 | 52.0 | 355.6 | 358.4 | 359.1 | 48.8 | 325.5 | 318.8 | 374.5 | - | 62.9 | 58.4 | 61.3 | - | 60.3 | 57.7 | 67.3 | - | 70.7 | 69.1 | 67.6 | - | 61.2 | 28.8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Cash Conversion Cycle |
- | 139.9 | - | 316.0 | - | 311.5 | 300.2 | 338.1 | 51.4 | 373.1 | 467.3 | 357.6 | 52.0 | 308.5 | 310.9 | 303.2 | 48.8 | 266.5 | 261.1 | 312.3 | - | 62.9 | 58.4 | 61.3 | - | 60.3 | 57.7 | 67.3 | - | 70.7 | 69.1 | 67.6 | - | 61.2 | 28.8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
All numbers in USD currency
Multiples are an important financial analysis tool for the company SeaSpine Holdings Corporation, allowing investors and analysts to quickly assess the company’s value and investment attractiveness based on the ratio of market indicators to the company’s financial performance. Essentially, multiples express how the market values the company relative to its earnings, revenue, equity, or other key metrics.
Advantages of Using Financial Ratios- Simplified Data Analysis
Financial ratios transform large volumes of accounting data into compact and easily interpretable indicators, significantly simplifying the assessment of the company’s condition. - Comparability Between Companies
Multiples standardize financial metrics, enabling objective comparison of companies of different sizes, industries, and market capitalizations. - Identification of Trends and Issues
Regular analysis of ratios helps track the dynamics of financial health, identify strengths and weaknesses of the business, as well as potential risks. - Decision Support
Financial multiples serve as an important tool for investors, creditors, and company management in making investment, credit, and managerial decisions. - Accelerated Assessment of Investment Attractiveness
Ratios allow quick determination of key performance, liquidity, and financial stability indicators, facilitating prompt evaluation of companies’ attractiveness for investments.
Using multiples enables comparison between companies, even if they differ in size or industry, as they standardize financial data into ratios convenient for analysis. This is especially useful for evaluating companies where direct analysis of financial statements may be complex or require in-depth knowledge.
USA
Britain
Israel
Canada
China
