Export financials
Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA)
The export includes the complete available history of financial statements and ratios. Numbers are provided in full, without million or billion abbreviations, in their original reporting units.
CSV downloads as a ZIP archive with one file for each report and frequency.

Alibaba Group Holding Limited Financial Ratios 2026-2011 | BABA
Brief overview of Alibaba Group Holding Limited's valuation and returns
Current figures are compared with the company's own five-year history for 2022–2026.
Key multiples at the end of the period are P/E 24.1x (median 23.93x), EV/EBITDA 36.99x (median 17.43x), P/S 2.44x (median 2.16x). The current ratio basket stands about 19.8% above the five-year base, increasing sensitivity to weak reports.
Current earnings relative to valuation equal about 4.1% on the 1/P/E measure. This is a valuation reference, not an expected payout.
Returns on assets and capital are represented by ROE 9.8%, ROA 5.4%, ROCE 4.7%. Low capital returns limit the ability to compound value internally.
Current PEG of 8.92x points to a premium over forecast earnings momentum.
The cash cycle changed only slightly and ended at 12 days.
Overall picture
Alibaba Group Holding Limited's multiples are demanding relative to current business quality. Material improvement is needed to justify them.
Annual Financial Ratios Alibaba Group Holding Limited
| 2026 | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24.1 | 16.6 | 19.7 | 23.9 | 32.2 | 15.1 | 33.4 | 35.7 | 46.6 | 43.2 | 17.3 | 51.3 | - | - | - | - | |
P/S |
2.4 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 3.2 | 9.8 | 8.3 | 11.9 | 11.9 | 12.2 | 16.3 | - | - | - | - |
EPS |
5.7 | 6.9 | 4.0 | 3.5 | 2.9 | 7.0 | 7.1 | 34.0 | 25.1 | 17.5 | 29.1 | 10.3 | 10.6 | 3.7 | - | - |
EV (Enterprise Value) |
3.15 T | 2.72 T | 1.98 T | 2.18 T | 2.43 T | 2.56 T | 5.1 T | 645 B | 537 B | 330 B | 197 B | 180 B | 37.8 B | 22.4 B | 12.8 B | 7.78 B |
EBITDA per Share |
4.58 | 8.8 | 6.77 | 5.96 | 4.41 | 5.33 | 5.32 | 26.5 | 30.3 | 21.3 | 13.4 | 11 | - | - | - | - |
EV/EBITDA |
37.0 | 16.5 | 14.5 | 17.4 | 25.5 | 22.2 | 45.6 | 6.2 | 4.9 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 5.2 | - | - | - | - |
PEG |
8.92 | 1.34 | -2.03 | -1.61 | -2.39 | 8.05 | 5.44 | 1.01 | 1.08 | -1.09 | 0.1 | 131.94 | - | - | - | - |
P/B |
2.2 | 2.0 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 1.9 | 2.1 | 5.7 | 5.2 | 6.8 | 5.9 | 5.0 | 7.9 | - | - | - | - |
P/CF |
32.8 | 13.2 | 8.6 | 8.7 | 14.0 | 9.8 | 27.7 | 4.7 | 4.8 | 4.6 | 4.1 | 5.7 | - | - | - | - |
ROE % |
9.76 | 12.88 | 8.11 | 7.35 | 6.56 | 16.06 | 19.78 | 14.44 | 14.69 | 13.60 | 28.64 | 15.41 | - | - | - | - |
ROA % |
5.42 | 7.21 | 4.53 | 4.15 | 3.67 | 8.91 | 11.38 | 9.11 | 8.94 | 8.62 | 19.61 | 9.50 | - | - | - | - |
ROCE % |
3.67 | 10.93 | 9.31 | 8.13 | 5.91 | 7.69 | 9.66 | 7.62 | 12.10 | 11.63 | 9.59 | 10.96 | - | - | - | - |
Current Ratio |
2.4 | 2.5 | 2.7 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 1.3 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 2.6 | 3.6 | - | - | - | - |
DSO |
12.0 | 11.3 | 12.2 | 13.6 | 12.8 | 11.9 | 12.0 | 29.0 | 37.0 | 49.3 | 42.4 | 53.5 | - | - | - | - |
DIO |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | 15.1 | 15.5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Operating Cycle |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | 44.0 | 52.5 | 49.3 | 42.4 | 53.5 | - | - | - | - |
Cash Conversion Cycle |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | 44.0 | 52.5 | 49.3 | 42.4 | 53.5 | - | - | - | - |
Annual performance
Select metrics to display
All numbers in CNY currency
Quarterly Financial Ratios Alibaba Group Holding Limited
| 2026-Q4 | 2026-Q1 | 2025-Q4 | 2025-Q1 | 2024-Q4 | 2024-Q1 | 2023-Q4 | 2023-Q1 | 2022-Q4 | 2022-Q3 | 2022-Q2 | 2022-Q1 | 2021-Q4 | 2021-Q3 | 2021-Q2 | 2021-Q1 | 2020-Q4 | 2020-Q3 | 2020-Q2 | 2020-Q1 | 2019-Q4 | 2019-Q3 | 2019-Q2 | 2019-Q1 | 2018-Q4 | 2018-Q3 | 2018-Q2 | 2018-Q1 | 2017-Q4 | 2017-Q3 | 2017-Q2 | 2017-Q1 | 2016-Q4 | 2016-Q3 | 2016-Q2 | 2016-Q1 | 2015-Q4 | 2015-Q3 | 2015-Q2 | 2015-Q1 | 2014-Q4 | 2014-Q3 | 2014-Q2 | 2014-Q1 | 2013-Q4 | 2013-Q3 | 2013-Q2 | 2013-Q1 | 2012-Q4 | 2012-Q3 | 2012-Q2 | 2012-Q1 | 2011-Q4 | 2011-Q3 | 2011-Q2 | 2011-Q1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPS |
- | 5.7 | - | 6.89 | - | 3.95 | - | 3.46 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
EBITDA per Share |
- | 4.58 | - | 8.8 | - | 6.77 | - | 5.96 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
ROE % |
29.91 | 37.26 | 27.50 | 12.88 | - | 7.26 | - | 7.35 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
ROA % |
17.17 | 21.32 | 15.90 | 7.21 | - | 4.53 | - | 4.15 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
ROCE % |
28.97 | 39.11 | 34.38 | 13.95 | - | 10.29 | - | 10.14 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Current Ratio |
2.4 | 2.4 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 2.8 | - | - | - | 2.8 | - | - | 2.8 | 3.0 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.0 | 2.8 | - | - | 2.8 | 2.6 | - | - | 2.6 | 2.8 | - | - | 2.8 | 3.2 | - | - | 3.2 | 2.6 | - | - | 2.6 | - | - | - | 1.6 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
DSO |
- | 3.0 | - | 2.8 | - | 3.0 | - | 3.4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Operating Cycle |
- | - | - | 2.8 | - | 3.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Cash Conversion Cycle |
- | - | - | 2.8 | - | 3.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Quarterly performance
Select metrics to display
All numbers in CNY currency
Multiples are an important financial analysis tool for the company Alibaba Group Holding Limited, allowing investors and analysts to quickly assess the company’s value and investment attractiveness based on the ratio of market indicators to the company’s financial performance. Essentially, multiples express how the market values the company relative to its earnings, revenue, equity, or other key metrics.
Advantages of Using Financial Ratios- Simplified Data Analysis
Financial ratios transform large volumes of accounting data into compact and easily interpretable indicators, significantly simplifying the assessment of the company’s condition. - Comparability Between Companies
Multiples standardize financial metrics, enabling objective comparison of companies of different sizes, industries, and market capitalizations. - Identification of Trends and Issues
Regular analysis of ratios helps track the dynamics of financial health, identify strengths and weaknesses of the business, as well as potential risks. - Decision Support
Financial multiples serve as an important tool for investors, creditors, and company management in making investment, credit, and managerial decisions. - Accelerated Assessment of Investment Attractiveness
Ratios allow quick determination of key performance, liquidity, and financial stability indicators, facilitating prompt evaluation of companies’ attractiveness for investments.
Using multiples enables comparison between companies, even if they differ in size or industry, as they standardize financial data into ratios convenient for analysis. This is especially useful for evaluating companies where direct analysis of financial statements may be complex or require in-depth knowledge.
Financial Ratios of other stocks in the Internet retail industry
| Issuer | Price | % 24h | Market Cap | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overstock.com
OSTK
|
- | 5.47 % | $ 762 M | ||
|
Qurate Retail
QRTEA
|
- | - | $ 143 M | ||
|
RumbleON
RMBL
|
- | 60.5 % | $ 56.9 M | ||
|
Ozon Holdings PLC
OZON
|
$ 2 970.5 | - | $ 620 B | ||
|
Amazon.com
AMZN
|
$ 270.88 | 1.48 % | $ 2.89 T | ||
|
eBay
EBAY
|
$ 123.56 | 2.14 % | $ 56.7 B | ||
|
JD.com
JD
|
$ 28.29 | -0.32 % | $ 80.5 B | ||
|
MercadoLibre
MELI
|
$ 1 490.26 | -2.77 % | $ 75.6 B | ||
|
Revolve Group
RVLV
|
$ 19.97 | -1.04 % | $ 1.42 B | ||
|
Blue Apron Holdings
APRN
|
- | 6.51 % | $ 238 M | ||
|
ВсеИнструменты.ру
VSEH
|
- | - | - | ||
|
Wayfair
W
|
$ 111.74 | -4.39 % | $ 14.3 B | ||
|
Farfetch Limited
FTCH
|
- | - | $ 985 M | ||
|
Poshmark
POSH
|
- | 0.02 % | $ 1.41 B | ||
|
1847 Goedeker
GOED
|
- | -2.46 % | $ 130 M | ||
|
MOGU
MOGU
|
$ 1.68 | -1.18 % | $ 4.12 B | - | |
|
ContextLogic
WISH
|
- | -2.26 % | $ 3.48 B | ||
|
iMedia Brands
IMBI
|
- | -18.52 % | $ 3.08 M | ||
|
Carvana Co.
CVNA
|
$ 72.94 | -4.35 % | $ 10 B | ||
|
Chewy
CHWY
|
$ 22.86 | -0.85 % | $ 9.47 B | ||
|
Baozun
BZUN
|
$ 3.53 | 2.62 % | $ 612 M | ||
|
Pinduoduo
PDD
|
$ 79.21 | -1.6 % | $ 443 B | ||
|
LightInTheBox Holding Co., Ltd.
LITB
|
$ 2.5 | -5.66 % | $ 549 M | ||
|
Jumia Technologies AG
JMIA
|
$ 5.53 | -2.21 % | $ 1.37 B | ||
|
Liquidity Services
LQDT
|
$ 46.08 | 2.58 % | $ 1.43 B | ||
|
Etsy
ETSY
|
$ 86.51 | -2.19 % | $ 8.85 B | ||
|
Oriental Culture Holding LTD
OCG
|
$ 1.63 | 1.24 % | $ 58.6 K | ||
|
Natural Health Trends Corp.
NHTC
|
$ 0.73 | -2.96 % | $ 8.39 M | ||
|
CarParts.com
PRTS
|
$ 8.5 | 5.2 % | $ 520 M | ||
|
Dada Nexus Limited
DADA
|
- | -1.26 % | $ 2.05 B | ||
|
Yunji
YJ
|
$ 1.21 | 0.05 % | $ 2.38 B | ||
|
Vipshop Holdings Limited
VIPS
|
$ 13.53 | -1.17 % | $ 1.35 B | ||
|
Ruhnn Holding Limited
RUHN
|
- | - | $ 279 M | ||
|
Secoo Holding Limited
SECO
|
- | 5.17 % | $ 14.1 M |