MarketCap
Facebook
X
Telegram
Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. Financial Ratios 2025-2008 | GILT
Brief overview of Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd.'s valuation multiples
The review covers five available annual periods spanning 2019 to 2025.
The latest available valuation ratios are P/E 46.6x (median 13.24x), EV/EBITDA 16.92x (median 13.57x), P/S 2.14x (median 1.58x). The combined multiple level is about 35.2% above the company's historical norm, leaving less valuation cushion.
The inverse P/E implies an earnings yield of 2.1%. This is not a dividend yield, but current earnings relative to market price.
The latest available business-quality ratios are ROE 4.1%, ROA 2.8%, ROCE 4.4%. Efficiency ratios are restrained, with capital and assets producing modest returns.
Price, earnings and growth produce a PEG of 2.53x. A high value reduces the cushion if growth slows.
The cash conversion cycle lengthened from 48.5 days to 75.2 days, or 26.7 days. More cash is tied up in operations.
Overall assessment
Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd.'s valuation is above historical references while efficiency remains restrained, increasing sensitivity to weak reports.
Annual Financial Ratios Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd.
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P/E |
46.6 | 12.7 | 13.2 | -64.0 | -152.9 | 20.3 | 12.2 | 22.4 | 57.5 | -53.4 | -3.0 | -136.1 | -11.1 | -9.4 | -28.4 | 6.0 | 77.8 | - |
P/S |
2.1 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 2.2 | 4.3 | 1.7 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.6 | - |
EPS |
0.3 | 0.4 | 0.4 | -0.1 | -0.1 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.1 | -0.1 | -1.2 | -0.0 | -0.4 | -0.6 | -0.1 | 0.8 | 0.1 | - |
EV (Enterprise Value) |
797 M | 195 M | 207 M | 293 M | 464 M | 783 M | 513 M | 501 M | 506 M | 419 M | 334 M | 316 M | 282 M | 324 M | 296 M | 125 M | 23.5 M | -73.9 M |
EBITDA per Share |
0.79 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.38 | 0.23 | 0.87 | 0.67 | 0.63 | 0.44 | 0.267 | -0.152 | 0.488 | 0.333 | 0.714 | 0.759 | 0.21 | 0.34 | - |
EV/EBITDA |
16.9 | 4.7 | 5.0 | 13.6 | 34.3 | -95.8 | 12.5 | 12.8 | 17.2 | 19.2 | -24.9 | 9.9 | 12.5 | 6.8 | 5.4 | 14.5 | 1.7 | - |
PEG |
2.53 | 0.56 | 0.55 | -4.5 | -10.8 | -0.77 | -0.21 | -0.44 | -0.82 | 0.58 | -0.0 | 1.5 | 0.48 | -0.03 | 0.24 | - | - | - |
P/B |
1.3 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 2.8 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.4 | - | - |
P/CF |
46.7 | 9.9 | 9.7 | 35.1 | 24.5 | 16.5 | 12.9 | 12.9 | -22.7 | 44.1 | -8.5 | -7.1 | 16.1 | 13.0 | -426.9 | 14.1 | -875.3 | - |
ROE % |
4.14 | 8.16 | 8.56 | -2.43 | -1.22 | 14.01 | 13.65 | 7.21 | 3.12 | -2.54 | -29.39 | -0.66 | -7.92 | -9.59 | -2.25 | 11.59 | 0.81 | - |
ROA % |
2.78 | 5.78 | 5.51 | -1.54 | -0.82 | 8.51 | 9.41 | 4.66 | 1.76 | -1.39 | -14.11 | -0.41 | -4.85 | -5.59 | -1.31 | 6.72 | - | - |
ROCE % |
4.42 | 8.44 | 9.35 | 3.83 | 0.84 | 14.34 | 9.01 | 7.87 | 4.53 | 0.32 | -10.32 | 1.90 | -1.30 | 2.27 | 2.21 | -1.68 | -0.29 | - |
Current Ratio |
- | - | - | - | - | 2.6 | 2.8 | 2.5 | 2.3 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.6 | - | - | - |
DSO |
54.8 | 56.4 | 65.4 | 38.5 | 23.8 | 83.3 | 65.7 | 106.9 | 127.9 | 117.1 | 104.0 | 96.5 | 92.6 | 77.8 | 55.6 | 40.7 | - | - |
DIO |
48.3 | 73.5 | 81.0 | 73.3 | 75.9 | 85.6 | 54.7 | 52.9 | 45.9 | 38.4 | 60.3 | 60.5 | 63.8 | 38.7 | 53.6 | -35.3 | - | - |
DPO |
27.9 | 29.4 | 39.1 | 48.3 | 51.1 | 60.3 | 51.4 | 61.8 | 57.7 | 53.0 | 40.9 | 55.1 | 49.1 | 36.0 | 42.7 | -21.8 | - | - |
Operating Cycle |
103.1 | 129.9 | 146.4 | 111.9 | 99.6 | 168.9 | 120.4 | 159.8 | 173.8 | 155.5 | 164.4 | 157.0 | 156.5 | 116.5 | 109.2 | 5.4 | - | - |
Cash Conversion Cycle |
75.2 | 100.5 | 107.3 | 63.6 | 48.5 | 108.6 | 69.1 | 98.0 | 116.1 | 102.5 | 123.4 | 102.0 | 107.3 | 80.5 | 66.4 | 27.2 | - | - |
All numbers in USD currency
Quarterly Financial Ratios Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd.
| 2025-Q4 | 2025-Q2 | 2024-Q4 | 2024-Q2 | 2023-Q4 | 2023-Q2 | 2022-Q4 | 2022-Q3 | 2022-Q2 | 2022-Q1 | 2021-Q4 | 2021-Q3 | 2021-Q2 | 2021-Q1 | 2020-Q4 | 2020-Q3 | 2020-Q2 | 2020-Q1 | 2019-Q4 | 2019-Q3 | 2019-Q2 | 2019-Q1 | 2018-Q4 | 2018-Q3 | 2018-Q2 | 2018-Q1 | 2017-Q4 | 2017-Q3 | 2017-Q2 | 2017-Q1 | 2016-Q4 | 2016-Q3 | 2016-Q2 | 2016-Q1 | 2015-Q4 | 2015-Q3 | 2015-Q2 | 2015-Q1 | 2014-Q4 | 2014-Q3 | 2014-Q2 | 2014-Q1 | 2013-Q4 | 2013-Q3 | 2013-Q2 | 2013-Q1 | 2012-Q4 | 2012-Q3 | 2012-Q2 | 2012-Q1 | 2011-Q4 | 2011-Q3 | 2011-Q2 | 2011-Q1 | 2010-Q4 | 2009-Q4 | 2008-Q4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPS |
0.35 | 0.07 | 0.44 | 0.11 | 0.41 | 0.17 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.76 | 0.05 | - |
EBITDA per Share |
0.79 | 0.23 | 0.72 | 0.27 | 0.73 | 0.33 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.21 | 0.34 | - |
ROE % |
15.73 | 20.15 | 22.82 | 26.25 | 24.84 | 3.88 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 11.59 | 0.81 | - |
ROA % |
10.73 | 13.46 | 15.46 | 16.40 | 5.51 | 2.67 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 6.72 | - | - |
ROCE % |
16.22 | 21.16 | 25.19 | 15.07 | 12.10 | 4.71 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | -1.68 | -0.29 | - |
DSO |
14.1 | 23.8 | 16.7 | 31.9 | 14.8 | 15.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 10.2 | - | - |
DIO |
13.5 | 29.2 | 18.0 | 35.0 | 22.2 | 23.9 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | -8.8 | - | - |
DPO |
7.2 | 11.9 | 8.2 | 14.6 | 8.1 | 8.8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | -5.4 | - | - |
All numbers in USD currency
Multiples are an important financial analysis tool for the company Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd., allowing investors and analysts to quickly assess the company’s value and investment attractiveness based on the ratio of market indicators to the company’s financial performance. Essentially, multiples express how the market values the company relative to its earnings, revenue, equity, or other key metrics.
Advantages of Using Financial Ratios- Simplified Data Analysis
Financial ratios transform large volumes of accounting data into compact and easily interpretable indicators, significantly simplifying the assessment of the company’s condition. - Comparability Between Companies
Multiples standardize financial metrics, enabling objective comparison of companies of different sizes, industries, and market capitalizations. - Identification of Trends and Issues
Regular analysis of ratios helps track the dynamics of financial health, identify strengths and weaknesses of the business, as well as potential risks. - Decision Support
Financial multiples serve as an important tool for investors, creditors, and company management in making investment, credit, and managerial decisions. - Accelerated Assessment of Investment Attractiveness
Ratios allow quick determination of key performance, liquidity, and financial stability indicators, facilitating prompt evaluation of companies’ attractiveness for investments.
Using multiples enables comparison between companies, even if they differ in size or industry, as they standardize financial data into ratios convenient for analysis. This is especially useful for evaluating companies where direct analysis of financial statements may be complex or require in-depth knowledge.
USA
Russia
Canada
Finland
Schweden
Israel
Cayman-islands
